Here’s a puzzle for the philosophers out there, a request for your intuitions.
- Suppose that we accept a minimal moral realism according to which moral propositions are bivalent on a correspondence theory of truth.
- Now suppose that I’m epistemically justified in believing that p, where p is a moral prescription of some kind–an injunction to take a particular action. It doesn’t matter what the action is.
Puzzle: Does being epistemically justified in believing that p entail that I am morally justified in taking the action enjoined by the prescription? Or is the moral justification a separate issue? Put another way, is it coherent to say that I am epistemically justified in believing that p, but not morally justified in taking the action recommended by p? Continue reading