I Told You, West Orange, You Fucking Fools

Posted on by under Electoral Ethics and Politics, Fatwas, West Orange

About a month ago, I invited the candidates up for election in West Orange to denounce the bigotry of one of their colleagues, Justin Goldsman (see here and here). Not one of them did. A few months before that, I had a conversation with West Orange Councilman Joe Krakoviak about the Mt Laurel inclusionary housing doctrine. The conversation touched on the prevalence of racism in the housing market. Krakoviak told me with great confidence that racism was a thing of the past.

Now, West Orange is in the midst of a sordid but utterly predictable scandal: both of the African American candidates in the election have been on the receiving end of racist comments designed to drive them, by intimidation, from the electoral field. Now, everybody is convinced that racism is a problem. And of course now everybody is doing their best to out-do their rivals in voicing their supposed abhorrence for racism, and their abhorrence of the failure to take a stand against it. But where were they a month ago?

Continue reading →

Is Being Right Enough?

Posted on by under Guest Post

The following guest post, a contribution to Buddhist philosophy, is by Huideng Chanyu.

Truth, Benefit and the Timing of Speech in Majjhima Nikaya 58
By Huideng Chanyu (慧灯禅语)

A correction can be accurate and still be an act of humiliation. A reassurance can be welcome and still leave someone dangerously mistaken. Neither observation tells us exactly when to speak. Together, however, they suggest that truth and a listener’s reaction are different considerations. The Abhaya discourse, Majjhima Nikaya 58, makes their relationship a subject of explicit examination. Its answer raises a further difficulty: who is entitled to decide that unwelcome words are beneficial?

Continue reading →

Open Borders and the Problem of Evil

Posted on by under migrant defense

It’s now become a kind of axiom in American politics that “open borders” are an absurd idea. Even Analilia Mejia, the left-most candidate among New Jersey’s Democrats, is quick to disavow the idea. “How do you have a country without borders?” she asks. Since you can’t, we can’t have open borders. Open borders means no country; no country means chaos. We can’t have chaos, so we must disavow open borders.

Continue reading →

Whose Streets?

Posted on by under activism, anarchism, migrant defense, Notes on the Anti-War Movement, Palestine, princeton

Permits, Nazis, and the Reclamation of Public Space

A pointed question came up during Public Comments at Princeton Municipal Council a few weeks ago, namely: “Why was a neo-Nazi group ‘allowed’ to march in Princeton despite lacking a permit?” As I’ve suggested here before, this is the wrong question to ask. It also diverts attention away from a series of questions that badly need asking.

Continue reading →

Notes on Lolita (3)

Posted on by under Art/Literature, Palestine, Rand

Laughter, Tragedy, and Comedy Revisited
I can’t resist offering a postscript of sorts to an earlier post I wrote about film depictions of Lolita. As I suggested there, Kubrick’s Lolita has widely been praised on the grounds that it captures the undeniable humor of the novel; by contrast, Lyne’s Lolita has been criticized because it mostly fails (or declines) to do so.

On my view, however, this gets things backwards: Kubrick’s version fails precisely because it plays Lolita as comedy; Lyne’s succeeds precisely because it plays Lolita as tragedy. There is undeniable humor in Lolita, as Kubrick and others have correctly recognized, but this humor fades to the background when contrasted with the tragedy depicted in it. In other words, to get Lolita right, its humor has to be subordinated to the tragedy it depicts, not foregrounded at the expense of the novel’s plot or theme. On my view, while Kubrick inverts the relevant priorities, Lyne gets them right.

Continue reading →

“Gaza as World Event”

Posted on by under Notes on the Anti-War Movement, Palestine, Princeton University

The Executive Board of the North American Society for Social Philosophy (NASSP), recently asked its membership (of which I’m one) for nominations of keynote speakers for its Forty-Fourth Annual Conference in mid-July 2027. The keynote at an academic conference is usually given by a well-known, distinguished professional in the field, and is usually focused on the theme selected that year for the conference. The theme at next year’s NASSP conference will be “Situated Stories: Belonging, Erasure, Replacement.”

Continue reading →

Where Does Joe Krakoviak Stand on an ICE-Free West Orange?

Posted on by under activism, Electoral Ethics and Politics, migrant defense, West Orange

Anyone who follows this blog knows that I split my time between Princeton and West Orange, New Jersey, and that I’ve made the case for ICE-Free legislation in both towns. If you don’t follow this blog, you know it now.

As it happens, both Princeton and West Orange have passed some form of ICE-Free legislation. Princeton passed an ICE-Free resolution in late September; West Orange mayor Susan McCartney issued an ICE-Free Executive Order in mid August. Both developments are good news, but Princeton has shown more wisdom in this respect than West Orange: while a resolution is law whose repeal requires the passage of a contrary resolution, an Executive Order can be repealed at will by the next mayor.

Continue reading →

ICE Out of the Bronx

Posted on by under activism, anarchism, cancel culture, Fatwas, migrant defense

The Bronx has a lot to be proud of tonight. Unfortunately, I seem to be having some trouble directly embedding the Facebook video I want, but this link takes you to it (the video is taken by Christina Alvarado of the Bronx, whose other videos are worth watching as well). Forget the Mayor’s statement and all of the furrowed-brow commentary out there in the mainstream media, and watch the people of the Bronx acting true to type in their native element.

Continue reading →

Notes on Lolita (2)

Posted on by under Art/Literature

Girl on Film: Kubrick’s Lolita versus Lyne’s

This is the second in my ongoing series of posts on Nabokov’s Lolita, which I’m “teaching” over a twelve-week “class” that started yesterday. The first installment in the series is here.

There’s a lot to be learned about a novel from seeing it in media other than the accustomed one, for instance, reading it in translation or watching a movie adaptation. A novel by design leaves a great deal to the imagination, and it’s always interesting to see how someone else has imagined it, particularly when that someone has to imagine it down to the details.

Continue reading →